Special
Meeting
BOARD OF
ALDERMEN
CITY OF
PARKVILLE, MISSOURI
December
11, 2001
CALL TO
ORDER
Mayor William
M. Quitmeier called the meeting to order in the Board Room at 7:15 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Ward 1 Alderman Jack Friedman - present
Ward 1 Alderman Charlie Poole - present
Ward 2 Alderman David McCoy - present
Ward 2 Alderman Dave Rittman - present
Ward 3 Alderman Marvin Ferguson - present
Ward 3 Alderman Linda Arnold - present
Ward 4 Alderman Frank McCoy - present
Ward 4 Alderman Marc Sportsman - not present
ALSO PRESENT: City Administrator Pat Hawver
Roxsen Koch and Bridget Guth, King Hershey
Jim Allen and Tony Borchers for River North
Kenneth Jaggers of Integra Realty Resources
Dennis Eckold, attorney for Pat Kelly and John Schott,
owners of property adjoining TIF property
TIF Commission members.
Those speaking: Brenda Davis, Charlie Kutz
Parkville Heights Shopping Center business owners.
Those speaking: Frank Muehlbach, Kevin Waters, Dave Elling
Evalyn Allen, resident of Parkville Heights subdivision
MEDIA PRESENT: Nancy Jack
Martha Zirschky for Platte Dispatch
Jewel Gopwani for Kansas City Star
Ed Gault and Shan Johnson for Channel 2
Five Boy Scouts
BILLS AND ORDINANCES
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED THAT BILL 2006, REPEALING
ORDINANCE 1990 AND RE-ENACTING IT TO CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARKVILLE
SELF-STORAGE, BE APPROVED FOR FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY; ALDERMAN POOLE
SECONDED; ALL AYE; MOTION CARRIED.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED THAT BILL 2006 BE
APPROVED ON FIRST READING AND PASSED TO SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY; ALDERMAN
ARNOLD SECONDED; ALL AYE; MOTION CARRIED.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED THAT BILL 2006 BE
APPROVED ON SECOND READING TO BECOME ORDINANCE 1991; ALDERMAN ARNOLD
SECONDED; ALL AYE BY ROLL CALL; MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
Above bill was posted 12/11/01.
Mayor Quitmeier explained the basis for the
ordinance which would amend our code to allow people in the newly annexed area
to run for office immediately if they will have lived in their homes in the
annexed area for a year as of April 2, 2002.
The present Code is in compliance with Missouri statutes, but the city
attorney, upon request from staff, researched case law and found that in other
states city residency requirements for people in newly annexed areas was not upheld
in higher courts. In one case the
higher court deemed the denial of equal rights to newly annexed residents who
had lived in their homes the required period of time was unconstitutional. The memo from the city attorney, with case
findings attached, had been copied and included in aldermen=s packets, and in press packets. The mayor asked for questions or comments on
the subject; there were none. It was
agreed to read the ordinance.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED THAT BILL 2007, FURTHER
DEFINING THE RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR CANDIDATES FOR CITY OFFICE LIVING IN
THE NEWLY ANNEXED AREA , BE APPROVED FOR FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY;
ALDERMAN FRIEDMAN SECONDED; ALL AYE; MOTION CARRIED.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED THAT BILL 2007 BE
APPROVED ON FIRST READING AND PASSED TO SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY; ALDERMAN
ARNOLD SECONDED; ALL AYE; MOTION CARRIED.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED THAT BILL 2007 BE
APPROVED ON SECOND READING TO BECOME ORDINANCE 1992; ALDERMAN FRIEDMAN
SECONDED; ALL AYE BY ROLL CALL; MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
Above bill was posted 12/3/01.
The mayor asked the city clerk to notify the
residents of the newly annexed area of the ordinance.
PARKVILLE
TIF PLAN
Attorney Roxsen Koch gave an explanation of
the plan. All aldermen should have
received copies of the resolution adopted by the TIF Commission at the public
hearing, she said.
BLIGHT: She gave the definition of blight for a TIF
area (see Page 3 of TIF book). The
City commissioned a study by an independent consultant. Interested persons may review the Blight
Study at City Hall; it is part of the TIF book. Page 14 of that study reports on Adefective
or inadequate street layout@
in the TIF area. The TIF Commission,
after the public hearing, and after learning the results of this study,
declared the area Ablighted.@
Mayor Quitmeier
said he and City Administrator Hawver are constantly receiving requests from
people who would like to put mini-warehouses, car washes, etc., on the street
behind the shopping center, with no type of cohesive planning, nor any
provision for stormwater drainage, which is presently causing problems in the
downtown area. He asked for questions
on the blighted aspect of the TIF area.
There were none.
REDEVELOPMENT: Ms. Koch talked about looking at the
redevelopment area as a whole, and whether it could be redeveloped on the whole
without adoption of the TIF plan.
Various individual parcels may be landlocked or the water runoff is bad
on certain parcels. Mayor Quitmeier
asked her if the TIF Plan conforms to Parkville=s
comprehensive plan. Ms. Koch believes
it does.
LENGTH OF
PLAN: The mayor said he thought the
length of the TIF plan was not more than 23 years. Ms. Koch confirmed that figure.
EMINENT
DOMAIN: Discussion ensued on eminent
domain. Page 25 of the TIF Book defines
Acquisition by Eminent Domain. No
property shall be acquired in this manner more than five years after the adoption of the ordinance approving the
redevelopment project.
RELOCATION
ASSISTANCE: Ms. Koch talked of the
relocation provisions, shown in the TIF Book as Exhibit 11. It provides for relocation payments for
eligible businesses. Mr. Ferguson asked
if the Board could require that all tenants be compensated? Ms. Koch said yes, but that would require a
new public hearing. Once you close the
public hearing you have to give published notice and notice by mail to all taxing
districts (to present a revised plan).
Mayor Quitmeier
said this plan generates a ton of benefits.
Relocation costs may be enormous and may make the program
unfeasible. We didn=t pay people anything in the flood or in the
train derailment, he said. He raised
the question AIf we extend (relocation assistance) beyond
statutory requirements, are we going to cause the project to fail?@ Mr.
Poole asked if $1,500 were a normal payment for relocation. Ms. Koch said the figure was probably
established more than 20 years ago.
Mr. Rittman said
for some of the people who have leases the cost of relocation could very well
preclude them from surviving. Somewhere
in between there has to be a safety valve.
$1,500 wouldn=t pay the phone bill. Mayor Quitmeier said merchants get to
choose the $1,500 or actual costs.
(Section 6.2 of Exhibit 11, Relocation Plan, offers a choice for
eligible businesses between the $1,500 payment and actual relocation
costs.) The question is whether they
are going to extend benefits to people who are renting on a month-to-month
basis.
Ms. Koch said the
TIF Commission moved to approve the plan as it was. That motion was seconded and unanimously adopted by the TIF
Commission.
Ms. Koch said only
persons who actually have a property interest are eligible to relocation assistance. If you=re
requiring them to move out prior to termination of their lease that=s different than a month to month tenant, who
does not have a property right, except for any portion of their 30-day period
they lose.
Mr. David McCoy
asked if that would apply to people who have leases expiring in the next 18
months. Ms. Koch said they would have
property rights only if the owner asked them to move out before their leases
expired. Mr. Rittman gave a
hypothetical case of a tenant whose lease would expire in 2004. His moving expenses are $25,000. What would he get? Ms. Koch said $25,000, unless he chose to take the $1,500. He has to make that choice within 30 days of
being required to vacate the premises.
The developer will have some negotiations with tenants who want to
relocate within the center.
Mayor Quitmeier
spoke of P&G Hardware, a present tenant of the center, whose owners wanted
to relocate and bought property west of the city and annexed it into the
city.
Mr. David McCoy
asked about a hypothetical tenant now paying $5 a square foot, who has no
leasehold interest, who couldn=t
find anything for less than $10 a square foot and decided to discontinue his
business). He would get nothing for
relocation if he chose not to relocate.
Ms. Koch said he is still going to go out of business even if you paid
his relocation costs.
Mayor Quitmeier
said if somebody builds a shopping center west of here and draws business away B what=s
going to happen to these shops? His
personal feeling is that it is not for government to spend tax dollars
monkeying with the free market system.
DIRECT TAX IMPACT
ANALYSIS: Ms. Koch explained this, and
noted that it is in the TIF book as Exhibit 9.
Mr. Poole asked
about the tax impact on the citizens of Parkville. Ms. Koch said that would be on Page 2 of Exhibit 9. There would be many more tax dollars coming
to the City of Parkville with the redevelopment than without it. Mr. Poole asked if there would be
additional sales tax for people shopping in Parkville. Ms. Koch said no. The whole concept of tax increment financing is that without the
development there won=t be an increase in sales, nor an increase in
the assessed value of the property. Tax
dollars used to help pay for the cost of the redevelopment would come out of
the incremental increase in sales taxes.
Those tax dollars would not be there without the redevelopment.
Discussion ensued
on benefits to the city over the next 23 years - over $20 million in additional
sales tax, and land being donated to the county for the community center in
Parkville. There will also be the
benefit of increased property taxes on the TIF facilities. There will be no risk to the City of
Parkville if this development does not go through.
The mayor asked
Ms. Koch if we had gone beyond what we need to do in this project. Ms. Koch said this project includes only
parcels that will be benefited. There
was a proposal for a Transportation Development District - an additional sales
tax of one cent. This proposal does not
require that extra tax to be adopted,
but it could be added to taxes in just the TIF area, solely for
properties in that area that are owned by the developer, unless a property
owner wants to join in. This plan says
only the developer. The mayor pointed
out if that happens it would not affect the City=s
bonding capacity C it would go through the County.
Mr. Allen thanked
the TIF commissioners, many of whom were present, for all the hard work they
put into the plan. They were from
various neighborhoods in Parkville, he noted.
The mayor added the appreciation of the City.
Mr. Allen said the
grocery is projected to be 56,000 square feet.
Mr. Rittman asked when the merchants would have to be out of their
businesses. Mr. Allen said they hope to
be able to work with all of the tenants presently there and keep them in the
center. The development company feels
there=s a substantial risk in closing too early,
but they do want developer approval from the City so they can begin talking to
the tenants. They hope to close in the
middle of the year; hopefully they can start on the grocery store first. They hope to have the rest of the buildings
ready for occupancy mid-2003.
Mr. Rittman said
those merchants whose leases expire before mid-2003 would not have the benefit
of the relocation assistance. Mr. Allen
said hopefully they will be able to negotiate mutually satisfactory
transactions with each of them. AWG
contacted them, and they have had discussions.
They have also talked to others who have approached them; but have tried
not to initiate contacts because they have no developer rights yet.
Mayor Quitmeier
said AWG told the City they would buy the shopping center and just put up the
grocery, and then we=d have a typical shopping center, with no
relocation assistance offered.
Mr. Allen said
they=re trying to make a pedestrian-friendly
center. There are areas set aside for
delivery trucks and garbage trucks so they will not be intrusive upon the
center. This TIF plan will use only 50%
of the incremental increase in sales tax, none of the present sales tax, and
none of the property taxes. Property
values and taxes will go up. The plan
allows for public improvement of roads, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and the community
center. Mr. Borchers discussed road
improvements. The mayor suggested that
when River North (the developer) is making improvements to the eastern half of
Bell Road, the City allocate funds to improve the west half, so the road can be
improved all at once. Public
improvements are noted on Pages 14 and 15 of the TIF book.
Mr. Borchers
talked about Highway 9. In talks with
MoDOT (Missouri Division of Transportation) they proposed a full turn lane at
Phillips/Dr. Donnelly=s office.
They=re also going to include a storm drain and
curb and gutter along Highway 9 in that area.
That will decrease silting into Riss Lake and mean less water at the
entrance to Pinecrest. There will be
two detention ponds on the site, the one at the southeast portion of the site
getting the most use. Drainage will go
south to the detention pond, rather than going under Highway 9. The turn off 63rd Street to
Highway 9 is very tight; it will be improved to make the turn easier. There will be another turn lane going into
Pinecrest.
The proposed
development does not warrant a signal on Highway 9, but there is a proposed
development for across Highway 9, and River North is suggesting to MoDOT that
the two developments should be considered together when the need for a signal
is evaluated.
Mr. Allen said the
major internal street in the development should alleviate the congestion at
Highway 45 and 9. The internal street
will be landscaped.
Mr. Allen spoke of
the TIF revenues. He said they won=t get reimbursed for any improvements unless
they are successful. This probably won=t happen for three or four years. There is significant risk; they are willing
to do it. Investors will get the
required return; they (River North principals) will work for less.
Kenneth Jaggers,
Integra Realty, spoke about the ABut
For@ analysis.
It is included in the TIF book as an addendum, marked Addendum B.
PUBLIC
COMMENT
Frank Muehlbach,
owner of Apple Market, said this is the largest large developable commercial site
in the area located near a major access
street. He said if this is not done in
a planned way, the way Mr. Allen and his partners have presented, he said it
could end up as a hodgepodge of pad sites that would be intolerable to this
area. He asked aldermen to approve this plan rather than
let the property be redeveloped on a piecemeal basis. He thinks it=s
a good plan.
Dave Elling, owner
of Dave Elling Insurance, said the City would actually be coming into the free
market process by approving a TIF. He
has been there 21 years. He has a
three-year lease. He will be renewing
in December of next year. He is not
opposed to it; he will get no reimbursement and no guarantee, but is willing to
live through it.
Mayor Quitmeier
asked Ms. Koch if there could be a deviation from the plan. Ms. Koch said the developer could not
substantially deviate from the plan without the Board=s approval.
The Board would make the determination as to whether the deviation would
be substantial.
Kevin Waters, The
Pastry Shoppe, said the bakery has been there since the center opened in
1969. By the time this comes to pass,
everyone will be out of lease with the exception of the grocery store and Gomer=s, because no-one else has been able to
negotiate a long-term lease. He just
wanted everyone to be aware of it. It=s a terrific plan, and great for
Parkville. The only source of income to
pay for anything is tenant rent, so rents will more than double; common area
maintenance will go up substantially.
All expenses are passed through to the tenant, including increased
property taxes. He asked aldermen to keep
that in mind.
Dennis Eckold,
attorney for Pat Kelly and John Schott, said he understood three properties
need to be acquired for this project.
The developer would need to meet with these property owners. At some point in time the developer may come
to the City and ask for eminent domain over the special property owned by Mr.
Kelly and Mr. Schott. When this special
property comes before the City, he asks that the Board not take its power of eminent domain
lightly. We (the property owners) will
deal in good faith, he said, and asked the City to do the same. Mayor Quitmeier said he does not think we
should get involved in negotiations over price. Mr. Friedman said he thought the property purchased by eminent
domain is at a price established by impartial persons appointed by the
court. Mr. Eckold said that=s debatable whether the price is fair. Mayor Quitmeier said the process would
include the right to appeal.
Mr. Allen pointed
out he was not represented by counsel, so if there=s anything with respect to the use of the
language Aspecial property,@ he objected to it. They (the developers, River North) understand that they are
required to negotiate in good faith and make a reasonable good faith offer, and
they will comply with the statutes. If
the City is not prepared to exercise its power of eminent domain, then they are
prepared to withdraw their offer to develop the property.
Evalyn Allen
spoke. She lives at 6415 Melody
Lane. She has no leasehold interest and
does not own any business at Parkville Heights. She did not represent anyone.
She guessed she was just a bored housewife and thought she needed to do
something that evening. They moved from
the inner city and thought they had left such terms as TIF and condemnation
behind them. She is concerned about the
almost automatic acceptance of the statutory definition of the term Ablighted area.@ She did not see how the concern with the
streets, the drainage, and the illegal dumping in any way renders this
redevelopment area a menace to health and the public welfare, or a social or
economic liability.
Mayor Quitmeier
asked if she had read the blight study.
She said no. The mayor said we
needed to get her a copy of it. She
said all she was doing there was urging the aldermen to make sure that
everything had been looked at carefully.
She said you=re messing with people=s money when you do a TIF. She=s
not opposed to a great development. She
said those businesses are not merely of value to the community; they are part
of the community. She said we don=t need more stores; if people want a
drugstore or other things, they can drive to them or they can move to that
area. She said AYou have the power to exercise some support B you don=t
have to roll over...@
The mayor said
they have worked for 2-1/2 to 3 years on this.
He personally took offense at her statement that they are just rolling
over. He personally has put in hundreds
of hours on this project on his own. He
asked her to please be careful with the words she selected, and know her facts
before she discussed them. He said this
board met in a work session on Saturday; the TIF Commission has worked
tirelessly on this, and now she=s
suggesting that they=re just rolling over. He recounted development in Parkville over
the years. You can=t stop development; you can shape it. This looks like a good shape to him. He lives in the same neighborhood she
does. He=s
sorry some of the merchants are going to get hurt.
Mrs. Allen said if
she could continue without further interruption she would appreciate it. She didn=t
think it behooved this council to roll over on any of the issues that affect
the merchants who have contributed to this community for this amount of
time. AIf
you have the ability to influence to affect ...
$1,500 doesn=t pay you back B
if you can=t afford double the rent, you=re going to lose that person,@ she said Athe
whole appearance of this plan looks like a sprawl mall.@ She
hasn=t seen any models or architect=s rendering, but she was hoping to see
something that would reflect the charm and the quaintness of downtown
Parkville.
Mayor Quitmeier
said they have worked hard to make sure this development does not look like
Tremont, with Blockbuster sitting out in front, or the AMC Theater, where you
can=t get in and out. This development differs substantially. Mrs. Allen said there=s
nothing to show what the buildings look like; Mayor Quitmeier said they have
had renderings at their meetings.
Mrs. Allen said
she was saying the aldermen should use their influence to help those merchants
who fall through the cracks, and should use their influence to see that they
get what they were told. Mayor
Quitmeier said Ms. Koch said the plan could have no substantial deviation
without approval of the Board.
Mrs. Arnold
thanked Mrs. Allen and said Mr. Muehlbach had spoken in favor of the project. Mrs. Allen said if she heard correctly he
was in a little different situation than the others.
Discussion ensued
about the appropriateness of using tax dollars to help merchants who suffered
from the flood and the train derailment, and will suffer from this
redevelopment. Mr. Waters said the
difference between the circumstances was that merchants can buy insurance
against floods and accidents. Mayor
Quitmeier reminded him that most did not have flood insurance.
The mayor spoke of
other redevelopment which could happen without the adoption of this plan. It could be Ahodgepodge@ or something we don=t want.
Mrs. Allen said because you think this is good you don=t need to be concerned about these people B the mayor said he is concerned, but doesn=t think it is appropriate to use tax dollars
for relief in a business situation.
Charles Kutz, a
resident of Riss Lake and a member of the TIF Commission, said he was disturbed
by the suggestion that they didn=t
follow the guidelines. The TIF Commission spent many hours and worked hard to
learn all aspects of the proposal, and then made a recommendation which was
sent to the Board.
Brenda Davis, a
resident of Parkville Heights at 8901 Melody Lane, said she would like to speak
not as the chairman of the TIF Commission, but as a resident of Parkville
Heights. She is so excited about the
new shopping center; she would love to have a drugstore. She has used these shops for years and
years, and she dearly loves some of them.
Her point is that she owns property right behind Picture Hills, and she
feels her tenant is her responsibility, and what they work out is between
them. She doesn=t see this situation as a TIF Commission
problem, or a Board problem. She sees
it as an opportunity for the Parkville Chamber of Commerce to assist these
merchants.
BILLS
AND ORDINANCES (resumed)
ALDERMAN FRIEDMAN MOVED TO APPROVE BILL 2008,
ADOPTING THE TIF PLAN AND NAMING RIVER NORTH AS THE DEVELOPER, AS
DISTRIBUTED, FOR FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY; ALDERMAN POOLE SECONDED; ALL AYE;
MOTION CARRIED.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED THAT BILL 2008 BE
APPROVED ON FIRST READING AND PASSED TO SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY; ALDERMAN
POOLE SECONDED; ALL AYE; MOTION CARRIED.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED THAT BILL 2008 BE
APPROVED ON SECOND READING TO BECOME ORDINANCE 1993; ALDERMAN POOLE
SECONDED.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON - AYE, with the hope that
the developer would work with the tenants and work out something that would
meet everyone=s expectations. Mayor Quitmeier agreed, and said he thought they all shared that
thought.
ALDERMAN RITTMAN - AYE, seconding Alderman
Ferguson=s comments.
He said for those who were concerned there was a development agreement
that would help in terms of getting it done.
He was very complimentary toward this project, and proud to say aye.
ALDERMAN POOLE - AYE; ALDERMAN FRIEDMAN -
AYE; ALDERMAN DAVID McCOY - AYE; ALDERMAN ARNOLD - AYE; ALDERMAN FRANK McCOY -
AYE; MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
ALDERMAN POOLE MOVED TO ADJOURN; ALDERMAN FERGUSON
SECONDED; ALL AYE; MOTION CARRIED.
ALDERMAN RITTMAN MOVED TO RECONVENE AND GO
INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL (2002 SALARIES) UNDER AUTHORITY OF
RSMo 610.021(3); ALDERMAN POOLE SECONDED; ALL AYE; MOTION CARRIED.
The special meeting was adjourned into
executive session at 9:10 p.m.
Discussion ensued.
ALDERMAN FERGUSON MOVED TO ADJOURN TO OPEN
SESSION; ALDERMAN POOLE SECONDED; ALL AYE; MOTION CARRIED.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:58 p.m.
Submitted by _______________________________
City Clerk Barbara
J. Lance - 12/14/01